Orlando Garcia, Jr. vs. Ranida and Ramon Salvador Essay

Orlando Garcia, Jr. (Network Diagnostics Center) versus Ranida and Ramon Salvador G.R. No. 168512 March 20, 2007 Realities: Respondent Ranida Salvador experienced a clinical assessment at the Community Diagnostics Center (CDC) as an essential for normal work. Garcia, a clinical technologist, led the HBs Ag (Hepatitis B Surface Antigen) test. On October 22, 1993, CDC gave the test outcome demonstrating that Ranida was â€Å"HBs Ag: Reactive.† The outcome bore the name and mark of Garcia as inspector and the elastic stamp mark of Dr. Castro as pathologist. When Ranida presented the test result to Dr. Sto. Domingo, the Company doctor, the last advised her that the discoveries showed that she is experiencing Hepatitis B, a liver malady. Hence, in light of the clinical report put together by Sto. Domingo, the Company fired Ranida’s work for bombing the physical assessment. It was later established that there was a mistake in the past assessment and that the respondent was not experiencing Hepatitis B. Respondent was rehired by the organization. ISSUE: Regardless of whether Garcia (CDC) is subject for harms to the respondents for giving an erroneous HBsAG test result. HELD: The Court held that CDC was careless in light of the fact that there was no authorized doctor in CDC as legally necessary. CDC isn't regulated, coordinated and directed by an authorized doctor as legally necessary, however by Ma. Ruby C. Calderon, an authorized Medical Technologist. In the License to Open and Operate a Clinical Laboratory for the years 1993 and 1996 gave by Dr. Juan R. Naã ±agas, M.D., Undersecretary for Health Facilities, Standards and Regulation, litigant appellee Castro was named as the head of CDC. In any case, respondent pathologist isn't the proprietor of the Community Diagnostic Center nor a worker of the equivalent nor the business of its representatives. Respondent pathologist goes to the Community Diagnostic Center when and where an issue is alluded to him. Castro’s rare visit to the clinical research center scarcely qualifies as a successful regulatory management and command over the exercises in the lab. â€Å"Supervision and control† implies the position to act straightforwardly at whatever point a particular capacity is endowed by law or guideline to a subordinate; direct the exhibition of obligation; limit the commission of acts; survey, endorse, amend or modifyâ acts and choices of subordinate authorities or units. In addition, Garcia led the HBsAG trial of respondent Ranida without the oversight of litigant appellee Castro. Ultimately, the contested HBsAG test result was discharged to respondent Ranida without the approval of litigant appellee Castro.

Anthem and Farenheit 451 Essay

Fahrenheit 451 and Anthem Comparison Essay When an individual is entangled inside a general public that directs their conduct, considerations, and conclusions they can't get a handle on the acknowledgment of their social orders degenerate nature. In any case, there is consistently the odd person who willing and fit for revealing reality of their general public. In the books Anthem by Ayn Rand, and Fahrenheit 451, composed by Ray Bradbury the principle characters of the books had the option to discover truth by, framing companionships that are restricted by their social orders, opposing the grain of society to pick up information or structure thoughts, and discovering imperfections inside their social orders. In this manner demonstrating that, when one looks for truth inside the limits of a controlling society it prompts self-disclosure since they discover the fortitude to get away. At the point when one looks for truth inside the bounds of a controlling society by framing kinships that are restricted it prompts self-disclosure, since they discover the mental fortitude to get away. For example, Montag a character structure the novel Fahrenheit 451. In the general public that he lived in, any kinds of perusing material was viewed as illegal. The individuals who volunteered to grasp the perusing material were viewed as similarly as destructive as the material itself, since it persuade â€Å"all the bogus guarantees, all the recycled ideas and time worn philosophies† that individuals had (Bradbury, 76). Nonetheless, Montag intentially become friends with an old man named Faber, who in his more youthful days, before the upset, was an English educator. Montag realize that Faber was learned in writing, yet he turned into his companion paying little heed to this reality since he was interested of the taboo fortunes that his general public kept from him. Then again Faber knew about the superb preachings, ideas, and thoughts that writing held, and he was additionally mindful of the blunder his general public was making when it chose to take out perusing material during its change. Despite the fact that he was aware of the significant data that would be lost Faber didn't stand up or battle against this choice, thusly he lost one of the most important things throughout his life: â€Å"I’m one of the blameless people who could have made some noise and out when no would tune in to the ‘guilty,’ yet I didn't talk and in this way became blameworthy myself†¦ Now it’s too late† (Bradbury, 82). Faber’s adversity kinship and his non-existent activity to battle for writing motivated Montag to find his actual self, and his own convictions that lead him to escape structure his general public so as to wind up lamenting the way that he didn't dissent for his entitlement to information. Along these lines demonstrating that by Montag shaping a kinship that was not excepted by his general public he found the boldness to get away. A second case of one discovering enough fearlessness to get away from a controlling society, as a result of a restricted companionship is Equality 7-2521 of the novel Anthem. In the general public wherein Equality 7-2521 lives sentiments and feelings that one may have towards another are taboo, since it makes that individual extraordinary and one of a kind from others inside a general public where everybody is to be viewed as equivalent. In spite of the fact that this is a principle law Equality ends up being attracted to a little youngster by the name of Liberty 7-2000. With his newly discovered fascination Equality 7-2521 connects with the young lady in order to grasp a relationship, and this is actually what he accomplishes. The connection between Equaulity 7-2521 and Liberty 7-2000 helped him find his actual self. It caused him to understand that he had the option to have love for another person and that there was not all that much or inappropriate about the sentiments that he was encountering and this was not revile however a preferred position, one that have him a person. Equality’s self disclosure, gave him the courage to get away from structure his general public, since it caused him to perceive how degenerate and controlling his general public was and it likewise caused him to understand that the main way he would genuinely be glad is on the off chance that he were free. The two characters with in the books Anthem, and Fahrenheit 451 found themselves by shaping kinships that were not excepted in their general public, a commotion the two cases they increased enough fearlessness to get away. Montag’s companionship with Faber enlivened Montag to get away and understand his actual self simply because he was hesitant to become what Faber was; a weakling, not ready to battle for his convictions. Interestingly, the kinship that Equality 7-2521 and Liberty 7-2000 shared motivated Equality to find his self, and getaway, since he was extraordinary and delighted in being special from the remainder of his general public. This shows albeit the two characters were motivated by kinships, the explanations behind their activities, and their self-revelation were unique. Hence demonstrating that, when one looks for truth inside the bounds of a controlling society it prompts self-disclosure, since they discover the mental fortitude to get away. A second factor that must be represented is the way that when one looks for truth inside the bounds of a controlling by defying the grain of society to frame thoughts or addition information it prompts self disclosure and it gives them the boldness to get away. A genuine case of this is Equality 7-2521. In the novel Anthem Equality looks for and discovers truth in his general public by finding a wellspring of vitality. The procedure of Equality’s disclosure was long and demanding and it comprised of resisting the standards that were set, on many provided evenings so as to slip away and work in his clandestine passage on his innovation. In view of what his general public lectured, he ingrained in his considerations that he was, â€Å"born with a curse† (Rand, 13). Fairness 7-2521 accepted this since he was interested about the idea of things and disrupted norms to investigate the world in which he lived. Nonetheless, when he found that he had the option to deliver a light from a source other than a flame his contemplations and sentiments towards himself and his general public changed. His general public would not like to perceive or acknowledge the new vitality that he found. The society’s oblivious towards Equality 7-2521’s disclosure, that could have changed the way that the general public lived and worked incensed him. In result it caused him to find that he was a novel person that had considerations that were unmistakably more indepth and outperformed the musings of others he was encircled by. Equity 7-2521’s hunt to pick up information helped him manufacture the solidarity to get away from the controlling society that he lived in light of the fact that he understood that it and the people that it contained were simply keeping him down structure finding his actual self and condition further. Correspondence 7-2521 looked for truth inside his general public by defying it and framing another thought and that invigorated him the to get away. Likewise, Montag from the novel Fahrenheit 451 was additionally looking for truth and did as such by defying his general public and picking up information that brought about fearlessness to slow down free. In the general public of this novel individuals were limited structure understanding writing, and to guarantee that this law was not broken. It was the activity of firemen to consume and annihilate all understanding materials. Montag was an ideal case of a fireman he ignighted books to guarantee that the malevolent lessons that they held could never by consumed by individuals of his general public, until his interest overwhelmed him: â€Å"there must be something in books, things we can’t imagine,†¦ there must be something there† (Bradbury, 51). This intrigue Montag had in cap his general public retained from it’s individuals before long overpowered him and he got himself revolting by furtively recouping and securing book structure homes that were being demolished in light of the writing that they contained; â€Å"Montag felt the shrouded book pound like a heart against his chest’’ (Bradbury, 39). In addition to the fact that Montag rebeled by taking books, however he grasped the information inside. The intelligence that he gained from these wellsprings of information lead him to self-revelation, since he understood the degenerate idea of his general public. His general public was degenerate to the point that he not, at this point needed to partake and repress individuals structure opening and extending their brains. Montag’s self disclosure is obvious when â€Å"suddenly the scent of lamp fuel made him vomit,† in spite of the fact that it was once such an incredible smell, that solitary a genuine fireman could love, and he could no longer satisfy his activity as a fireman and be upbeat (Bradbury, 49). Montag’s freshly discovered information gave him the mental fortitude to escape since he perceived that on the off chance that he stayed and kept on being constrained by his general public that he could always be unable to spread the information and insight that he had picked up. Both Equality 7-2521 and Montag revolted inside their society’s and in result shaped thoughts or caught some type of astuteness. Besides, both found themselves and perceived from their disclosure that they expected to break free shape their general public so as to have opportunity and the will to share their propelled information and thoughts. Montag and Equality 7-2521 both made revelations that could have and would have changed the way their society’s worked and thought. Despite the fact that, what Montag acknowledged had been perceived by people in his general public before as opposed to Equality’s newfound light source that was obscure to his general public. In this way demonstrating when one looks for truth inside the bounds of a controlling society, it prompts self-revelation, since it gives them the fortitude to get away. The last factor that must be represented is the way that when one presues truth inside the limits of a controlling society by discovering imperfections inside, it prompts self-disclosure, since they discover the boldness to get away. A case of this is Equality 7-2521. The general public that he lived in is exceptionally biased and accepts that similarity is basic with the end goal for all to be content. Their Motto: â€Å"We are one in all and al